A. Definition of
economic freedom
Economic
freedom is the condition in which individuals can act with autonomy while in
the pursuit of their economic livelihood and greater prosperity. Any discussion
of economic freedom has at its heart reflection on the critical relationship
between individuals and the government.
Economic
freedom is an essential aspect of human liberty, without which a person’s
rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness may be fundamentally
compromised. As Friedrich Hayek once observed, “To be controlled in our
economic pursuits means to be controlled in everything.” Hayek’s keen insights
on economic freedom are based on the moral truth that each person is, as a
matter of natural right, a free and responsible being with inalienable dignity
and fundamental liberties that righteous and effective political systems should
regard as unassailable.
B. Definition
of liberal economic
Liberal
economic system is also called market economy system. In a market economy
system decisions on economic issues is the main result of a deliberate decision
made by the producers and individual consumers. In other words, the economic
problems that the main left to the market. Therefore, this system is known as a
free market economy or a market economy.
C. The
characteristics of a liberal economic system
- All economic activities left entirely to the public.
- Free enterprise society, innovation, and creativity in economic activity.
- Individual property rights are recognized.
- Economic activity is intended to seek maximum profit (profit oriented).
- Government's participation in economic activities is very limited.
- The existence of competition among entrepreneurs in the pursuit of profit.
- The prices are determined by market forces occur.
D. The
advantages and disadvantages of liberal economic system
- 1. The advantages :
a.
The
presence of free enterprise, innovation, and creativity in economic activity.
b.
Competition
among employers to encourage the advancement of technology.
c.
Individual
property rights are recognized.
- 2. The disadvantages :
a. Could lead to oppression (exploitation)
by man to man.
b. The existence of the gap between rich
and poor due to the absence of income distribution.
c. Many arise monopoly practices that harm
the public.
DISCUSSION
A.
The Limit of Economic Freedom
In the
era of globalization as it is today, free market economy is something that can
not be avoided. Countries determined to remain a closed country become unable
to develop its economy, or even go bankrupt and become a failed state. Just
look at what happened with North Korea and Myanmar * the economy is not growing
as well as the Soviet Union broke up in 1991. Meanwhile, countries that have
been running since the beginning of the free market economy has developed into
a prosperous country and obtain rapid progress in technological innovation,
scientific discovery, education, culture and so forth.
Likewise
if we look at history, Japan can be a developed country such as current as they
open market that began in the Meiji period in 1868. Since then the Japanese
economy is growing rapidly and reached its peak in the 1960s that the real
growth reached 10%. 1980s became the golden age of automotive and electronic
goods exports to Europe and the United States. So is the case with China. While
still a closed communist country of China is synonymous with poverty. As for now,
after opening its markets since the economic reforms in 1978, China became the
country with the fastest growing economy and the country with the second largest
economy after the United States. The number of poor people in China were reduced
dramatically from 53% in 1981 to just 8% in 2001. Yet what was actually a
liberal economy?
B.
Liberal economic
Free market economy or liberal
economics was first coined by Adam Smith in his book The Wealth of Nations .
The birth of the idea of the free market in the 18th century was a reaction
to the growing merkantalisme system at that time . Merkantalisme is the
economic system that oppresses the interests of a small group , because it
applies monopoly , protection , privilage ( privileges ) granted by the state
for the sake of a handful of entrepreneurs. Therefore Adam Smith argued that
every individual should be free to carry out their economic activities and the
state should not interfere in the economy because they would reduce the
efficiency of economic activity . Thus, in this system the economy left
entirely to the market mechanism and the role of the state is limited to the
provision of infrastructure and government administration . In this market
mechanism , Adam Smith argued that there would be invisible hand that regulates
the market automatically so that prosperity be realized . But the reality is the
invisible hand does not always work and only
enjoyed a handful of people. Ninety-four percent of the world income by only 40
percent of world population, and 60 percent of the world population have to
share revenue from six percent of the world's remaining income. Conditions are not
much different than the era of Adam Smith opposed merkantalisme. This happens because
the system does not provide protection to those who are not able to compete and
lead to the accumulation of enormous wealth for the winning side and monopoly.
In
addition, free-market production also handed over the affairs of merit goods (goods
that are very important to the prosperity of society) and public goods to the market
so that the existence and affordability of basic needs of society can not be ascertained.
It would be very dangerous when volatile markets. Because it is a free market
economy should be limited, or in other words the government can not simply wash
their hands of economic affairs with give it to the market mechanism. It is in
fact, no country is really run the free market economy as a whole. Even though
Americans still provide protection to some products that are considered
strategic. But excessive government intervention will also hinder the
development of the economy, even to destroy. So to what extent should the
government intervene? Or in other words, where is the freedom of the free
market economy?
C.
UUD 1945 and the limits of economic
freedom freedom
It
turns out that the undang-undang 1945 would have set this clearly. In pasal 33,
ayat 2 explicitly states that "The branches of production which are
important for the country and which dominate the life of people controlled by
the state" so it is clear that for certain items that are important to the
State and the people living Haat should not be to be submitted bergitu only on
market mechanisms. There should be government intervention to ensure the
availability of goods proficiency level. Likewise in pasal 33, ayat 3 states that
"The earth and water and the natural riches contained therein shall be
controlled by the state and used for the greatest welfare of the people." So
plenipotentiary state in managing the natural resources that exist in this
country, including in this case oil, gas, and other mineral resources. This does
not mean that we deny the existence of anti-foreign and multinational companies
in Indonesia, but these companies must submit to the state as the host and the property
owner. Their existence must be able to provide the maximum prosperity for the
people. But in practice it is often subject to state their interests and where they
actually give misery to the people. This is what we have on.
The
government has just issued a number of regulations handed fields that should be
controlled by the state to the market mechanism. Law meliberalisas oil and gas
sector is important to the State and lives of many people. So the stock is now
dependent on the national energy market. This liberalization was also willing
to do the food sector through the Food Bill. Though it is clear that food is a
basic need of the people. As to pasal 34, ayat 2 states that "The state
shall develop a system of social security for all people and empower the weak and
incapable in accordance with human dignity." I want to focus on the phrase
"empower the weak and incapable in accordance with human dignity". So
the state is obliged to empower those who are not or have not been able to
compete in a free trade competition. Empowerment of the country can be a protection,
subsidies, etc. and it is not prohibited. America and some European countries also
meproteksi their food industry. But what happened in Indonesia, tap import just
opened at the time of local products have not been able to compete with
imported products that lead to the demise of the local industry. Here does not mean we are anti to imports because
imports are needed. However, imports are causing the demise of local products that
we have to about
D.
Example Activities economic liberal.
- Agreement between the North American countries of North America Free Trade Area (NAFTA), which, if not one of up to canada and mexico american union (although mexsiko is central american country but politics geared american)
- Agreement between the united countries of Central America Free Trade Area (CAFTA) that included ex savador, Guatemala etc.
- Agreement between the ASEAN AFTA (ASEAN Free Trade Area) agreement between ASEAN members so between members should free trade costs among fellow members
- Agreement between ASEAN and China (china asean free trade area) "if no one name" that is where all the products are exported to china will have duty-free entry, and vice versa to neagara ASEAN member
CONCLUSION
Countries
that do not want to open their markets would be very difficult to develop. But
in UUD 1945 has been explained that there are certain areas that can not be
left only to the market. The government was obliged to empower the local industry
in the global competition and not to opening of the market will destroy them. That's
what must be kept in mind. Could not all are left to the market, because that
freedom has its limits, as well as with the free market.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar